ArticlePituitary2025
Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary metastases: an international multi-institutional study.
Article in Pituitary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pituitary metastasis as an endocrine-neuro-ophthalmologic emergency: clinical red flags and outcomes from a contemporary tertiary-center series.Pituitary · 2026Article
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for pineal gland metastases: results from the international radiosurgery research foundation.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPituitary metastases (PM) account for 0.4% of all intracranial metastases and typically present with visual and endocrinological deficits. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown excellent tumor control and safety profile in the management of intracranial metastases. However, its role and safety in managing metastases to the pituitary gland are not well-characterized. This study aims to evaluate SRS outcomes and safety profile in the management of PM in a multicenter international cohort.
methodsThe authors retrospectively analyzed data from 63 patients with PM treated with SRS across 12 institutions, assessing clinical and radiological outcomes, including survival rates, tumor control, visual and endocrinological outcomes, and post-treatment complications.
resultsAmong 63 patients included in the study (median tumor volume: 1.5 cc), SRS demonstrated a local tumor control rate of 93.1% at 12 months. The median survival was 25.4 months and overall survival rates of 77.6%, 65.9%, and 55.1% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a margin dose for PM > 10 Gy emerged as an independent predictor across progression-free survival (HR: 0.20, p < 0.01), distant metastasis-free survival (HR: 0.30, p = 0.01), and overall survival. (HR: 0.15, p < 0.01). Following SRS, most patients showed stable or improved visual function (n = 17/18). A small percentage of patients experienced complications: developed new visual deficits (n = 1/63), experienced new anterior pituitary hormone deficiency (n = 5/63), and developed arginine vasopressin (AVP)-deficiency post-treatment (n = 2/63).
conclusionSRS is an important modality in the management of PM, offering excellent local tumor control and survival outcomes with minimal morbidity. These findings support the incorporation of SRS into the multidisciplinary management for treating patients with PM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40442537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.