ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Comparison of the frequency of viral infections in patients with inborn errors of immunity receiving immunoglobulin by different routes.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) is the primary treatment for immunocompromised patients and can be administered via intravenous, subcutaneous, or facilitated subcutaneous routes. In this study, our objective was to compare the incidence of viral infections among patients receiving IRT via different administration routes during the winter season. Fifty-eight patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) receiving immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) were enrolled in the study. Patients were monitored for their immunoglobulin (Ig) levels, nasal swabs were studied with PCR monthly, and any viral infections were documented. The study included 58 patients with PID, with 33 males (56.8%) and 25 females (43.1%). The median age of the patients was 17 years (IQR, 28.5), and the median age at diagnosis was 11.5 years (IQR, 25.5). The most common IRT route was IVIG, used by 55.1% (n = 32) of patients, followed by cSCIG 27.5% (n = 16), and facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 17% (n = 10) of patients. The overall frequency of viral infections was 3.79%, distributed among IRT routes as follows: IVIG (n = 32, 4.2%), cSCIG (n = 16, 2.5%), and fSCIG (n = 10, 4.4%). The infection rate in the cSCIG route was significantly lower than in the IVIG and fSCIG routes (p < 0.05). The most common viral agents were adenovirus (21.8%), influenza A (16.4%), and human rhinovirus/enterovirus (16.4%).
conclusionIn a 3-month evaluation of patients, the infection rate was lower in the cSCIG route compared to the other IRT routes. cSCIG is a safe and viable treatment option that can effectively improve the quality of life for immunocompromised patients. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) is the standard treatment for patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID), aiming to prevent infections by maintaining adequate serum immunoglobulin levels. Limited research exists regarding the impact of IRT on the prevention of viral infections. WHAT IS NEW: • This study reveals key insights into viral infections in PID patients receiving immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) during winter. The overall viral infection rate was 3.79%, with IVIG at 4.2%, cSCIG at 2.5%, and fSCIG at 4.4%. Notably, the cSCIG group had a significantly lower infection rate than the IVIG and fSCIG groups (p0.05). These findings suggest that cSCIG may lower the risk of viral infections in PID patients during high-risk winter months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.