ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025
The role of vacuum erection device and penile traction therapy in the patients after radical prostatectomy: a narrative review.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncosexology: A Narrative Review on Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Tailored Mesoporous Silicate Nanomaterials in Regenerative Medicine and Theranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for localized prostate cancer, which unfortunately often results in sexual dysfunction, including, but not limited to erectile dysfunction (ED), penile atrophy and penile fibrosis. Various therapies have been used to manage these side effects associated with RP, including vacuum erection devices (VEDs) and penile traction therapy (PTT). This review focuses on the mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical applications of VED and PTT in post-RP patients. VED, a well-established, non-invasive modality, enhances penile blood flow, preserves tissue integrity, and facilitates early engagement in sexual activity. Although VED has been shown to help maintain penile length and improve sexual function, its effectiveness in accelerating spontaneous erectile function recovery remains uncertain. PTT, originally developed for Peyronie's disease, has recently been explored for post-RP patients. Preliminary studies suggest its potential in mitigating penile shortening and supporting functional recovery, though long-term efficacy data remain limited. Both therapies face challenges, including lack of standardized protocols, adherence issues, and encouraging, but limited evidence on their combined use with pharmacological interventions. Additionally, factors such as patient education, treatment accessibility, and psychological support play critical roles in therapy adherence and overall success. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols, improve patient compliance, and establish the role of VED and PTT in comprehensive post-RP care through large-scale, well-designed clinical trials.
Identifiers
40442485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.