Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442485›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

The role of vacuum erection device and penile traction therapy in the patients after radical prostatectomy: a narrative review.

Tung Shu, Danqing Ren, Run Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tung Shu *Division of Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA. tung.shu@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8712-3650
Danqing Ren *Division of Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2965-3527
Run WangDivision of Urology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA. runwang@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6635-4093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for localized prostate cancer, which unfortunately often results in sexual dysfunction, including, but not limited to erectile dysfunction (ED), penile atrophy and penile fibrosis. Various therapies have been used to manage these side effects associated with RP, including vacuum erection devices (VEDs) and penile traction therapy (PTT). This review focuses on the mechanisms, efficacy, and clinical applications of VED and PTT in post-RP patients. VED, a well-established, non-invasive modality, enhances penile blood flow, preserves tissue integrity, and facilitates early engagement in sexual activity. Although VED has been shown to help maintain penile length and improve sexual function, its effectiveness in accelerating spontaneous erectile function recovery remains uncertain. PTT, originally developed for Peyronie's disease, has recently been explored for post-RP patients. Preliminary studies suggest its potential in mitigating penile shortening and supporting functional recovery, though long-term efficacy data remain limited. Both therapies face challenges, including lack of standardized protocols, adherence issues, and encouraging, but limited evidence on their combined use with pharmacological interventions. Additionally, factors such as patient education, treatment accessibility, and psychological support play critical roles in therapy adherence and overall success. Further research is needed to optimize treatment protocols, improve patient compliance, and establish the role of VED and PTT in comprehensive post-RP care through large-scale, well-designed clinical trials.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.