ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2025
Effect of X-Ray Energy on the Quantitative Yield of γH2AX and 53BP1 Foci in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular and Cellular Effects of CT Scans in Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the influence of X-rays generated at the peak anode voltages of 50, 100, and 200 kVp on the quantitative yield of foci (localized dynamic microclusters) of proteins involved in repair critical radiation-induced DNA damage, double-strand breaks (γH2AX and 53BP1), in cultured human mesenchymal stem stromal cells. Calculations of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) based on the experimentally obtained dose curves of changes in the number of γH2AX and 53BP1 foci indicate that relative to the standard 200 kVp X-ray radiation taken as 1, the RBE of 100 kVp radiation is ~1.15, and that of 50 kVp is ~1.50. The obtained results indicate the necessity for thorough fundamental studies for evaluation of the real RBE of low-energy X-rays with subsequent correction of the weighting factor values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40442472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.