SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Clinical outcomes of off-label DOAC underdosing in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world evidence on off-label underdosing of direct oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation: prescribing patterns, determinants, and outcomes.Future science OA · 2026Article
- A Case of Thromboembolic Cerebral Infarction Occurring Perioperatively in Acute Lower Limb Embolic Ischemia.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often receive underdosed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), deviating from standard guidelines. The impact of underdosing compared to standard dosing on thromboembolic and bleeding risks in this population remains unclear. This meta-analysis included 13 studies with 37,633 Japanese AF patients comparing underdose and standard dose groups. Efficacy outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism and ischemic stroke. Safety outcomes were major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, all bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were pooled using a random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses evaluated robustness by including studies with confounder controls. Underdosing showed similar risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87-1.22) and ischemic stroke (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85-1.31) compared to standard dosing. Major bleeding (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.72-1.04) and all bleeding (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63-1.03) showed a non-significant reduction with underdosing. Sensitivity analyses confirmed a significant reduction in major bleeding risk with underdosing (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.94). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the underdose group throughout the primary (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.90) and sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, Japanese patients receiving an underdose of DOACs had thromboembolic event rates comparable to those seen with standard dosing, with a reduction in bleeding events confirmed by sensitivity analyses and higher mortality. These findings indicate that ethnic-specific factors may influence DOAC effects, warranting further investigation to validate these observations and inform tailored dosing recommendations for Japanese AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40442451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.