ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimising the mechanical properties of concrete for non-structural applications through partial replacement of fine aggregates with wastewater sludge.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the potential of wastewater sludge (WWS) as a partial replacement for fine aggregates in non-structural concrete to optimise its mechanical properties while mitigating environmental impacts. WWS from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), Mankweng, Polokwane, and Seshego, in Limpopo Province, South Africa, was used to replace sand at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20% by weight. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD), and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) were used to characterise the organic compositions of the sludge and sludge-based concrete. The environmental safety of the sludge-based concrete was then assessed through the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) at 28, 90, and 140 days, ensuring compliance with heavy metal leaching limits. The results demonstrate that at a 5% replacement level, the concrete maintained an average compressive strength of 25 MPa after 90 days, meeting general construction standards for non-structural and low load-bearing applications. The incorporation of wastewater sludge had low leachable heavy metals, with TCLP results confirming all tested metals remained below regulatory limits throughout. However, increasing WWS content beyond 10% resulted in higher porosity, reduced compressive strength, and increased water absorption, which compromise durability. The findings highlight the importance of optimising replacement levels and mix design to balance sustainability, mechanical performance, and regulatory compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.