ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Minimizing variance in pediatric patients after repair of anorectal malformations.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA standardized anorectal malformation (ARM) perioperative protocol was implemented across two pediatric tertiary hospitals. The protocol addressed antibiotic duration, feeding advancement, VACTERL workup, and wound management. We aim to evaluate complications, length of stay (LOS), and protocol compliance.
methodsIntroduced in June 2020, data from a 24-month protocol cohort (after a 6-month transition) were compared to a 24-month control cohort. Outcomes included demographics, compliance, complications and LOS.
resultsForty-five patients were included (control: 26, protocol: 19). Most were diagnosed with rectoperineal fistula (53%), 42% had significant cardiac disease, and 44% underwent prior colostomy. VACTERL workup was completed in 89%. Thirty-five patients underwent posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, and 10 cutback anoplasty. Median postoperative LOS was unchanged (control: 2 days; protocol: 2 days, p=0.80). Total LOS showed no difference (control: 3 days, protocol: 2 days, p = 0.51). No wound infections occurred. Wound dehiscence occurred in 1 control and 2 protocol patients (p=0.57). Compliance was 53% with deviations attributed to early diet initiation (n=4), incomplete VACTERL workup (n=2), and wound care (n=2).
conclusionA standardized ARM perioperative protocol is feasible across institutions. It maintained excellent outcomes, including short LOS and few complications, though the small sample limited statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40442369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.