ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Efficacy of the caudal view technique in mesh placement during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, with propensity score matching.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo prevent recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery, placing a large mesh that ensures adequate overlap of the hernial orifice is crucial. However, using totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach, the arcuate line can obstruct the creation of sufficient space for large meshes, making the application challenging. To solve this problem, we introduced a caudal view technique (CVT), inserting a 5-mm scope from a cordal port, to assist in making sufficient space for mesh placement, and dissecting the arcuate line as needed. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the CVT method in facilitating appropriate large mesh placement.
methodsIn this retrospective study, data of 58 patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia and treated with TEP between April 2020 and March 2024 were analyzed. The patients were divided into the conventional three-port TEP and CVT groups. We compared the rate of proper 15.7 × 10.3-cm mesh placement, mesh placement time, and operative time between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate, incidence of intraoperative, and postoperative complications. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for potential confounders.
resultsThe rate of proper mesh placement was 48.4% and 92.6% in the conventional and CVT groups. The average mesh attachment time was shorter in the CVT group. The average operative time was similar between the two groups. Recurrence occurred in one patient in the conventional group, whereas no recurrence was found in the CVT group. No significant differences were observed regarding intraoperative and postoperative complications.
conclusionThe CVT method could allow for sufficient dissection of the myopectineal orifice and facilitate large mesh placement within shorter time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40442358What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.