ArticleScientific reports2025
eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- eHealth Literacy and Quality of Life in Patients: A Narrative Review of Mediating Effecting.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study attempts to uncover eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients receiving inpatient treatment. We collected the data of this cross-sectional study from 300 chronic patients face-to-face between August 1 and November 30, 2023. Participants were administered a demographic information form, the e-Health Literacy Scale, and the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening. We analyzed the data using independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and simple linear regression analysis. Our findings showed that only one-fifth of participants were knowledgeable about cancer screening programs. The most prevalent facilitating and hindering factors of getting screened for cancer were found to be professional healthcare guidance and lack of knowledge, respectively. Participants had a mean score of 14.17 ± 10.29 on the e-Health Literacy Scale and 89.66 ± 20.86 on the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening. Moreover, we found that the greater the eHealth literacy, the more positive participants' attitudes toward cancer screening. Finally, 6.4% of the variance in the cancer screening attitudes was explained by eHealth literacy (p < 0.05). Insufficient eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients, particularly those receiving inpatient treatment, are likely to lead patients to remain incognizant of their elevated risks and unable to cooperate with their physicians. Our findings imply designing multidisciplinary initiatives to boost e-health literacy among chronic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.