ArticleScientific reports2025
Improvement of metaphor understanding via a cognitive linguistic model based on hierarchical classification and artificial intelligence SVM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimize a chain convenience store location prediction model by using MTS-machine learning methodology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to enhance computers' ability to understand and generate metaphors, offering a novel perspective and technical approach in the field of natural language processing. It proposes a metaphor recognition algorithm that combines a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a Support Vector Machine (SVM). First, the text is transformed into numerical features using a pre-trained word embedding model. Then, local contextual features are extracted through a multi-layer CNN. These features are subsequently input into the SVM for classification, enabling optimal metaphor recognition. In English verb metaphor recognition tasks, the model-when combined with the SVM classifier-achieves an accuracy of 85%, an F1 score of 85.5%, and a recall of 86%. In Chinese metaphor recognition experiments, the integration of the SVM classifier significantly improves performance, yielding an F1 score of 81.5%, an accuracy of 81%, and a recall of 82%. In conclusion, the proposed model effectively integrates the CNN's powerful feature extraction capabilities with the SVM's superior classification performance. Additionally, it incorporates part-of-speech features to enhance semantic analysis. This integrated approach enables more accurate identification of complex textual semantics, particularly in interpreting metaphorical language that requires deeper understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.