ArticleScientific reports2025
Genetic landscape of Romanian children with inborn errors of immunity via gene panels, exome, and genome sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facial Dysmorphism and Severe Vascular Phenotype in TRNT1 Deficiency with Concomitant Antithrombin III Deficiency.Journal of clinical immunology · 2026Article
- From variants to answers: The evolution of genetic counseling in IEI.Journal of human immunity · 2026Review
- Whole Genome Sequencing as First Diagnostic Approach for Inborn Errors of Immunity in Adults: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Correlations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Variability Associated with Jagunal Homolog 1 (JAGN1) Deficiency Caused by the c.63G>T Variant.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Deciphering the clinical and genetic spectrum of early-onset inborn errors of immunity in a Brazilian pediatric cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are monogenic disorders with a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes including immune dysregulation, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, and malignancy. IEI may have life-threatening consequences, thus precise and timely genetic diagnosis is crucial for improved access to treatment, genetic counselling and prevention. We aimed to investigate the genotypic findings in a cohort of children with IEI from Romania, in order to understand the diagnostic yield of genetic testing, genetic characterization of IEI and impact of genetic diagnosis. Clinical and genetic investigations were performed in 92 children (50% boys) with IEI phenotype, evaluated between 2018 and 2024, in a tertiary reference genetic center in Timisoara, Romania. Sanger sequencing, next generation sequencing panels with genes associated with IEI (1-474 genes), WES and WGS were used. Disease-causing variants for IEI (pathogenic/likely pathogenic) were identified in 37/92 (40.2%) participants, in 25 genes. 14/92 (15.2%) participants had relevant variants of uncertain significance. Median age at genetic testing was 4.38 (IQR 2-12.8) years. 15/37 (40.5%) of patients with Disease-causing variants had a family history of IEI. NGS gene panels were used in 43/92 (46.7%) patients, WES in 29 (31.5%), while WGS in 20 (21.7%). Twelve patients had more than one genetic test. Most frequent genes with Disease-causing variants identified were: JAGN1(5 patients) and AIRE(3). A great variety of genes were identified as causative for IEI. Considering the highly variable and unspecific phenotype, together with no family history in most cases, prioritizing genetic investigations offers the best option for timely diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.