Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442267›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Gaussian random fields as an abstract representation of patient metadata for multimodal medical image segmentation.

Bill Cassidy, Christian McBride, Connah Kendrick, Neil D Reeves, Joseph M Pappachan, Shaghayegh Raad, Moi Hoon Yap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bill CassidyDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK. bill.cassidy@stu.mmu.ac.uk.
Christian McBrideDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.
Connah KendrickDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.
Neil D ReevesMedical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, UK.
Joseph M PappachanLancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, PR2 9HT, Preston, UK.
Shaghayegh RaadDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.
Moi Hoon YapDepartment of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing rates of chronic wound occurrence, especially in patients with diabetes, has become a recent concerning trend. Chronic wounds are difficult and costly to treat, and have become a serious burden on health care systems worldwide. Innovative deep learning methods for the detection and monitoring of such wounds have the potential to reduce the impact to patients and clinicians. We present a novel multimodal segmentation method which allows for the introduction of patient metadata into the training workflow whereby the patient data are expressed as Gaussian random fields. Our results indicate that the proposed method improved performance when utilising multiple models, each trained on different metadata categories. Using the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Challenge 2022 test set, when compared to the baseline results (intersection over union = 0.4670, Dice similarity coefficient = 0.5908) we demonstrate improvements of +0.0220 and +0.0229 for intersection over union and Dice similarity coefficient respectively. This paper presents the first study to focus on integrating patient data into a chronic wound segmentation workflow. Our results show significant performance gains when training individual models using specific metadata categories, followed by average merging of prediction masks using distance transforms. All source code for this study is available at: https://github.com/mmu-dermatology-research/multimodal-grf.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMetadataAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID40442267
PMCPMC12123013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.