Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442243›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

New healthcare payment models: risk scores aren't enough to guide resource allocation.

Christopher Crowley, Bradley Harner, Amy R Stuck, Tyler Kent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher CrowleyWest Health Institute, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA. ccrowley@westhealth.org.
Bradley HarnerWest Health Institute, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Amy R StuckWest Health Institute, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tyler KentWest Health Institute, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around the world, aging populations compel healthcare delivery systems to improve how they allocate increasingly scarce resources. In parallel, economic pressures motivate healthcare payors and policy makers to adopt global budgeting and accountable payment models based on actuarial risk. We investigated whether these risk-based approaches could apply to healthcare resource allocation. Because a significant portion of healthcare resources for older adults is currently associated with potentially avoidable hospital admissions, we focused our investigation on allocating care coordination resources targeted toward those most likely to be admitted. Using a computational risk-based analysis of claims data, we found the 20% highest expected hospital utilization segment had an average hospitalization rate of over 68% per year, compared to 27% for the overall study population. However, only half of all hospitalizations in the study population were accounted for in the top 20% risk segment. Additionally, 63% of beneficiaries in the top 20% risk segment experienced zero hospitalizations. Our results indicate that risk-based resource allocation may fail to target some high hospital utilizers while allocating resources to many who are never hospitalized. These results further indicate that risk-based expectation of hospital utilization may be insufficient as a basis for effective allocation of care coordination resources.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Care RationingResource AllocationAgedFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleRisk AssessmentHealthcare economicsHospital utilizationOlder adultsResource allocationRisk

Identifiers

PMID40442243
PMCPMC12122729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.