Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442226›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Reassessment of aviation risk safety barriers using stochastic and lexical uncertainty.

Hendri Saputra, Sutanto Soehodho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hendri SaputraCivil Engineering Department, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.
Sutanto SoehodhoCivil Engineering Department, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia. sts@ui.ac.id.

Funding

Universitas Indonesia NKB-345/UN2.RST/HKP.05.00/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results of many investigations and statistical data indicate that aircraft accidents are an iceberg phenomenon for understanding the gap among traffic management, operations, and aviation systems. Although the regulator has established a safety barrier as a defense mechanism against hazards, many accidents and incidents continue to occur. Instead of conducting a comprehensive assessment of an accident/incident prevention system, the evaluator conducted a common audit investigation to determine the causal and contributing factors of accident. Current problems of concern in aviation safety management involve a series of constraints, evaluation methods, and complex decision-making processes. Uncertainty in these problems adds complexity. Uncertainty has characteristics such as randomness and vagueness; in nature, both might occur concurrently. The method is based on incorporating probability (randomness) and fuzzy logic (vagueness) to better represent real-world systems. Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) and Fuzzy data processing provide some insight into the results of this research. Viewed from a stochastic perspective, all variables are valid, and from a lexical uncertainty perspective, the assigned membership function could provide a proper fuzzy partition. Based on the calculation, this research proposed new safety barrier rates, such as "poor visibility" is below 5.9 km for non-instruments and below 3.56 km for instruments, "unsafe crosswind" is above 6 Knots for Aircraft Mass > 5700 Kg and above 3.2 knots for Aircraft Mass < 5700 Kg. Also, for the rate of pilot experience, it needs to pass 3485 h (flying) to become a Pilot in Command in a particular type of aircraft.

Indexed as

Accident or incidentLexical uncertaintyRisk assessmentStochastic uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40442226
PMCPMC12122929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.