ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing drawing frame variables to enhance polyester spun yarn quality using soft computing techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse input optimization for tuning two-ply yarn processing parameters using feedforward neural network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimization of cotton two-ply yarn parameters to enhance tensile strength using the grey wolf optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-objective optimization of speed frame parameters for polyester spun yarn using artificial intelligence and grey relational analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores optimizing the production of 100% polyester spun yarn by analyzing key drawing frame variables, such as break draft, total draft, back roller gauge, and front roller gauge, using a systematic and algorithmic approach. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to design the experiment and produce yarn samples. The yarn mass variation per unit length (CVm%) and the Imperfection Index (IPI), which includes the total count of thick places, thin places, and neps, were modeled using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and optimized with a Genetic Algorithm (GA). These two yarn quality responses significantly determine the appearance quality of textiles. Sensitivity analysis of the ANN models revealed that break draft was the most influential input variable, contributing 35.58% and 28.72% to the models for CVm% and IPI, respectively. The optimal drawing frame variables were determined as a break draft of 1.33, a total draft of 7, a back roller gauge of 60.5 mm, and a front roller gauge of 47.5 mm, yielding CVm% and IPI values of 11.91% and 22.82, respectively. This study integrates RSM, ANN, and GA to present a innovative approach for optimizing yarn spinning. The findings not only enhance yarn quality with greater precision and efficiency but also offer valuable insights applicable to broader textile manufacturing processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.