Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effect of esketamine on postinduction hypotension in elderly patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Esketamine on Peripheral Vascular Resistance in Elderly Patients During Anesthesia Induction: A Single-Center, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine-Lidocaine for Anesthesia Induction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postinduction hypotension (PIH) increases the risk of perioperative adverse events. This study aimed to test if low-dose esketamine could significantly decrease the incidence of PIH in elderly patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial in university-affiliated academic tertiary hospital. Patients (65 to 85 years, ASA physical status classification II or III) randomly received esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) or normal saline intravenous injection before general anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the incidence of PIH. The secondary outcomes were the profiles of induction and adverse events during postinduction period. Several different definitions of hypotension and postinduction period were prespecified as the sensitivity analysis. The baseline characteristics were comparable between esketamine group (n = 211) and normal saline group (n = 213). The incidence of PIH was significantly lower in esketamine group than that in normal saline group (44.1 vs. 64.8%, P < 0.01). Esketamine pretreatment significantly decreased the consumption of propofol (P < 0.01) and the rate of vasoconstrictor utilization (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postinduction adverse events between two groups (all P > 0.05). And, no other severe adverse events were observed. The sensitivity analysis displayed the robustness of the conclusion, though the effect size was lower than 0.2 under certain definition of PIH. A low dose of esketamine treatment before general anesthesia induction for elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery could significantly reduce the risk of PIH.Trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100051179); registered 15 September 2021. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 24 February 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.