Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442190›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A curated benchmark dataset for molecular identification based on genome skimming.

Renata C Asprino, Liming Cai, Yujing Yan, Peter J Flynn, Lucas C Marinho, Xiaoshan Duan, Christiane Anderson, Goia M Lyra, Charles C Davis, Bruno A S de Medeiros

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Renata C AsprinoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
Liming CaiDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8982-2435
Yujing YanDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6271-0794
Peter J FlynnDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3182-7671
Lucas C MarinhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1263-3414
Xiaoshan DuanDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2462-8399
Christiane AndersonUniversity of Michigan Herbarium, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, USA.
Goia M LyraDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Charles C DavisDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA. cdavis@oeb.harvard.edu.
Bruno A S de MedeirosField Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, 60605, USA. bdemedeiros@fieldmuseum.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1663-668X

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB0544039National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB1355064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome skimming is a promising sequencing strategy for DNA-based taxonomic identification. However, the lack of standardized datasets for benchmarking genome skimming tools presents a challenge in comparing new methods to existing ones. As part of the development of varKoder, a new tool for DNA-based identification, we curated four datasets designed for comparing molecular identification tools using low-coverage genomes. These datasets comprise vast phylogenetic and taxonomic diversity from closely related species to all taxa currently represented on NCBI SRA. One of them consists of novel sequences from taxonomically verified samples in the plant clade Malpighiales, while the other three datasets compile publicly available data. All include raw genome skim sequences to enable comprehensive testing and validation of a variety molecular species identification methods. We also provide the two-dimensional graphical representations of genomic data used in varKoder. These datasets represent a reliable resource for researchers to assess the accuracy, efficiency, and robustness of new tools to varKoder and other methods in a consistent and reproducible manner.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantBenchmarkingGenomicsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID40442190
PMCPMC12122930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.