ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing cross cultural urban park emotional wellbeing impact in Shanghai and London.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying and mapping uncertainty in urban sentiment prediction: a combined approach with entropy and SHAP explanations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Personality and spatial familiarity interact to shape affective responses in urban parks: a VR study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Multimodal property video neuroanalytics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban parks serve as restorative environments that can alleviate stress and improve mood. However, quantifying the emotional benefits of parks and uncovering geographic differences across regions presents challenges. This study aims to compare the cross-cultural impact of urban parks on visitors' positive emotions between Shanghai and London. We collected text data from Weibo and Twitter, applying natural language processing techniques to quantify emotion scores. A LightGBM regression model was used to explore the nonlinear relationships between park environments and positive emotions, while a Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model was constructed to reveal spatial heterogeneity and its underlying causes. The results indicate that all environmental variables have nonlinear effects on visitors' positive emotions, with cross-cultural differences reflected in emotional responses: (1) Cross-cultural factors play an important role in influencing positive emotions of visitors in different regional urban parks, mainly reflected in different emotional well-being. (2) In Shanghai, higher economic vitality and greater walkability enhanced visitors' positive emotions in urban parks. (3) In London, high accessibility does not promote visitors' positive emotions, showing a contrast to the effect observed in Shanghai. However, higher education density and lower parking lot density contributed to positive emotions for park visitors in London. (4) Visitors in Shanghai are more likely to experience positive emotions in medium-sized parks, while in London, visitors tend to feel more pleasant in small parks. The findings of this study indicate that the park environment plays a significant role in fostering positive emotions in visitors. Additionally, future research could explore the impact of socio-cultural factors on emotional responses, expanding beyond the focus on the park's physical attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.