Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442167›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Acid Red 88 biodegradation by Cu nanoparticles stabilized on Marinospirillum alkaliphilum strain N.

Samira Eshghi, Fereshteh Jookar Kashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samira EshghiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Ootb-E Ravandi Blvd, Kashan, Isfahan, Iran.
Fereshteh Jookar KashiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Ootb-E Ravandi Blvd, Kashan, Isfahan, Iran. Jookar@kashanu.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, Cu nanoparticles (CuNPs) have emerged as a widely used and cost-effective tool, especially in analytical fields. This study investigates the biological properties of CuNPs synthesized by strain Cu1 and their efficiency in degrading Acid Red 88 dye. Additionally, it evaluates the potential of a novel combination of Marinospirillum alkaliphilum strain N and CuNPs for AR88 biodegradation. Strain Cu1, a copper-resistant strain from the Sungun copper mine, was used for biosynthesizing CuNPs, with 16S rDNA sequence analysis showing a 99.10% similarity to Micrococcus lylae. Characterization via UV-Vis, FTIR, XRD, and SEM-EDX confirmed that the CuNPs were spherical-shaped and ranged in size from 20 to 100 nm. These nanoparticles demonstrated antimicrobial effects against various bacteria. The cell free extract/CuNPs and biomass/CuNPs of the degrading Marinospirillum alkaliphilum strain N achieved 100% degradation of Acid Red 88 within 11 h. In contrast, cell free extract and the biomass of strain N alone required 24 h to achieve the same result. FTIR and GC-MS analyses verified the degradation of AR88 dye. Toxicity assessments using Artemia salina and radish seeds revealed that Acid Red 88 dye was toxic. In contrast, metabolite biodegradation and CuNPs exhibited low toxicity, no mortality of A. salina, and no inhibiting seed germination.

Indexed as

Azo CompoundsCopperMetal NanoparticlesAnimalsArtemiaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalAzo CompoundsCopperAntimicrobial assayCuNPsDye degradationImmobilizationToxicity

Identifiers

PMID40442167
PMCPMC12122916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.