Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442155›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A ninth-year follow-up survey of attitudes and behaviors of obstetricians and gynecologists toward HPV vaccination in Japan.

Maki Nakai, Emiko Oka, Yutaka Ueda, Asami Yagi, Tatsuo Masuda, Mamoru Kakuda, Satoshi Nakagawa, Kosuke Hiramatsu, Tadashi Iwamiya, Shinya Matsuzaki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maki NakaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7519-7333
Emiko OkaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. okaemiko0@gyne.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2639-0855
Yutaka UedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-6379
Asami YagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-5963
Tatsuo MasudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-7144
Mamoru KakudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2768-8848
Satoshi NakagawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6540-9040
Kosuke HiramatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-7875
Tadashi IwamiyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2787-8894
Shinya MatsuzakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-9994
Michiko KodamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-7572

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 23EA1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Japanese government suspended its proactive recommendation for routine HPV vaccination for nine years, from June 2013 to May 2022, due to concerns about unconfirmed reports of adverse events. This study represents the fifth in our ongoing series of surveys assessing Japanese obstetricians' and gynecologists' attitudes toward HPV vaccination, and the first survey conducted since the recommendation was reinstated. In January 2024, we distributed a questionnaire to 632 obstetricians and gynecologists affiliated with Osaka University Hospital. The survey evaluated their attitudes toward HPV vaccination for both daughters and sons. A total of 348 specialists (55.1%) responded. After the government resumed its proactive recommendation, approximately 90% of their daughters had received or planned to receive the HPV vaccine. Among daughters eligible for catch-up vaccination, 71.4% had been vaccinated. Over 70% of respondents agreed that boys should also routinely receive HPV vaccination. Among those with sons aged 12 to 16 at the time of approval for boys, 12.5% had vaccinated them. Most respondents ensured HPV vaccination for their daughters, and some for their sons. Encouraging physicians from other specialties to do the same may help promote widespread HPV vaccine uptake in Japan.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPhysiciansVaccinationAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGynecologistsGynecologyHumansJapanMalePapillomavirus VaccinesCatch-up vaccination programGynecologistHPV vaccineJapanObstetricianSuspension of recommendation

Identifiers

PMID40442155
PMCPMC12122873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.