ArticleScientific reports2025
The balance between integration and segregation drives network dynamics maximizing multistability and metastability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain's ability to switch between functional states while maintaining both flexibility and stability is shaped by its structural connectivity. Understanding the relationship between brain structure and neural dynamics is a central challenge in neuroscience. Prior studies link neural dynamics to local noisy activity and mesoscale coupling mechanisms, but causal links at the whole-brain scale remain elusive. This study investigates how the balance between integration and segregation in brain networks influences their dynamical properties, focusing on multistability (switching between stable states) and metastability (transient stability over time). We analyzed a spectrum of network models, from highly segregated to highly integrated, using structural metrics like modularity, efficiency, and small-worldness. By simulating neural activity with a neural mass model, and analyzing Functional Connectivity Dynamics (FCD), we found that segregated networks sustain dynamic synchronization patterns, while small-world networks, which balance local clustering and global efficiency, exhibit the richest dynamical behavior. Networks with intermediate small-worldness (ω) values showed peak dynamical richness, measured by variance in FCD and metastability. Using Mutual Information (MI), we quantified the structure-dynamics relationship, revealing that modularity is the strongest predictor of network dynamics, as modular architectures support transitions between dynamical states. These findings underscore the importance of the balance between local specialization, global integration, and network's modularity, which fosters the dynamic complexity necessary for cognitive functions. Our study enhances the understanding of how structural features shape neural dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.