ArticleScientific reports2025
Innovative integration of automated breast volume scan and ultrasound elastography for enhanced differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Inclusion Boundary Identification Using Wave Propagation in Optical Coherence Elastography.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Measurement of Supraspinatus Tear Size Using Previously Acquired Ultrasound Images Obtained by Multiple Examiners.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Combined 2D-US and CDUS Nomogram for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A Retrospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection through imaging is critical for improving patient prognosis. While conventional two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) is widely utilized in clinical practice, it has several limitations, including high operator dependency, limited reproducibility, and the lack of standardized examination protocols. To overcome these challenges, the Automated Breast Volume Scan (ABVS) has been developed as an advanced ultrasound technique, offering fully automated, high-resolution breast imaging with improved reproducibility and standardized acquisition. Furthermore, ultrasound elastography (UE) provides complementary functional information by assessing tissue stiffness, aiding in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of ABVS combined with UE in distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions. A prospective study was conducted involving 93 patients with a total of 103 breast lesions, all classified as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 or higher on conventional ultrasound. Between October 2023 and October 2024, all participants underwent both ABVS and UE, with pathological biopsy results serving as the diagnostic "gold standard". Of the 103 lesions, 47 were confirmed malignant, while 56 were benign. The combined diagnostic approach yielded a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 75%, and overall accuracy of 84%, demonstrating superior diagnostic performance compared to either ABVS or UE alone. Our findings indicate that the integration of ABVS and UE enhances diagnostic accuracy, improves lesion localization, reduces operator dependency, and strengthens the reliability of breast cancer detection. This combined imaging strategy holds significant potential for optimizing breast cancer screening and early diagnosis, ultimately contributing to better clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.