ArticleScientific reports2025
Cycling with hemianopia to explore road user detection and scanning behaviour in virtual reality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cyclists with homonymous hemianopia (HH) may face challenges in detecting road users, especially in unpredictable situations or with distractors. This study examined how HH affects detection, scanning behaviour, and the relation between detection and scanning in a virtual cycling environment.Participants with real HH, simulated HH, and unimpaired vision (N = 12 per group) cycled in a virtual environment, braking upon detecting road users during predictable and unpredictable events, with and without distractors. Scanning behaviour and detection performance (time remaining at braking onset before a collision would have occurred (TTC)) were recorded.TTC was similar across groups and unaffected by distractors. Real and simulated HH participants showed larger TTC declines, i.e. lower performance, during unpredictable events than unimpaired vision participants. Real HH participants scanned similarly to unimpaired vision participants, while simulated HH participants scanned their blind hemispace more. In real HH, wider horizontal gaze distribution was associated with longer TTC.Individuals with HH can maintain detection performance in our virtual environment, but may be hindered more by unpredictability. Scanning a wider horizontal range may improve detection, but a scanning bias towards the blind hemifield, observed in simulated HH, did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.