Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40442101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cycling with hemianopia to explore road user detection and scanning behaviour in virtual reality.

E M J L Postuma, G A de Haan, F W Cornelissen, J Heutink

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E M J L PostumaDepartment Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G A de HaanDepartment Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. g.a.de.haan@rug.nl.
F W CornelissenLaboratory for Experimental Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J HeutinkDepartment Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclists with homonymous hemianopia (HH) may face challenges in detecting road users, especially in unpredictable situations or with distractors. This study examined how HH affects detection, scanning behaviour, and the relation between detection and scanning in a virtual cycling environment.Participants with real HH, simulated HH, and unimpaired vision (N = 12 per group) cycled in a virtual environment, braking upon detecting road users during predictable and unpredictable events, with and without distractors. Scanning behaviour and detection performance (time remaining at braking onset before a collision would have occurred (TTC)) were recorded.TTC was similar across groups and unaffected by distractors. Real and simulated HH participants showed larger TTC declines, i.e. lower performance, during unpredictable events than unimpaired vision participants. Real HH participants scanned similarly to unimpaired vision participants, while simulated HH participants scanned their blind hemispace more. In real HH, wider horizontal gaze distribution was associated with longer TTC.Individuals with HH can maintain detection performance in our virtual environment, but may be hindered more by unpredictability. Scanning a wider horizontal range may improve detection, but a scanning bias towards the blind hemifield, observed in simulated HH, did not.

Indexed as

BicyclingHemianopsiaVirtual RealityAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultHomonymous hemianopiaOvert attentionRoad user detectionScanning behaviourVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40442101
PMCPMC12122899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.