Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2025
NMDA receptor involvement in dopaminergic modulation of neuroplasticity induced by paired associative stimulation.
Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Opioid- and NMDA-receptor-dependent neural plasticity mediates long-term analgesia from motor cortical stimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDopamine (DA) modulates long-term potentiation (LTP)-like neuroplasticity. While particularly D1 and D2 receptors are thought to influence neuroplasticity through glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) modulation, the exact mechanisms are not completely clarified.
objectiveWe aimed to explore the relevance of NMDA receptor activity for DAergic modulation of focal LTP-like plasticity induced by excitatory paired associative stimulation (ePAS).
methodsIn a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled design, 17 healthy participants received DAergic agents (100 mg L-Dopa for general DAergic enhancement, 10 mg bromocriptine for selective D2 receptor activation, or placebo) with different doses of the partial NMDA receptor agonist D-cycloserine (CYC; 50, 100, 200 mg, or placebo) and underwent ePAS. Cortical excitability was monitored via motor-evoked potentials induced by TMS over the left motor cortex for up to 2 hours post-stimulation.
resultsWe did not find significant interactions between DAergic agents, CYC, and time across the entire sample, but significant group differences depending on sensitivity to ePAS. In high-sensitivity, but not low-sensitivity participants, ePAS induced LTP-like effects. CYC produced nonlinear, dose-dependent effects on plasticity in both groups. In the high-sensitivity group, LTP-like effects persisted under both DAergic agents, but were significantly reduced under bromocriptine. CYC had a nonlinear effect when combined with bromocriptine. In the low-sensitivity group, ePAS under DAergic agents did not induce LTP-like effects, and only additional intervention with medium-dose CYC restored facilitatory effects under L-Dopa.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that optimal NMDA receptor activation is necessary for ePAS-induced neuroplasticity and that D2 receptor activity may reduce LTP-like effects by downregulating NMDA receptor function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.