Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40441768›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Feasibility study protocol: implementing consultation-based high-quality palliative care services in intensive care units.

Ye Sul Jeung, Yejin Kim, Seyeon Kim, Yoon Sun Jung, Tae Jung Kim, Shin Hye Yoo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06490835 (A Feasibility Study Protocol for Implementing Consultation-based Palliative Care Services to Provide High-quality Palliative Care to Families of Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06490835 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Feasibility Study Protocol for Implementing Consultation-based Palliative Care Services to Provide High-quality Palliative Care to Families of Critically Ill Patients in Intensive Care Units: A Single-arm Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsHigh-quality palliative care through consultation-based palliative care services in the ICU
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ye Sul Jeung *Center for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-5951
Yejin Kim *Center for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-3385
Seyeon KimCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3911-9876
Yoon Sun JungDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-4436
Tae Jung KimDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea (the Republic of).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3616-5627
Shin Hye YooCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea (the Republic of) ifi1024@snu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7473-1082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCritically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) receive life-sustaining treatments aimed at restoring or maintaining organ function. ICU admission often involves substantial multidimensional suffering that can burden patients, their families and surrogates. Multidisciplinary palliative care support can help alleviate their sufferings. In South Korea, however, palliative care has not yet been integrated into critical care settings, highlighting the need to explore the feasibility of its implementation within the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study aims to test the feasibility of a consultation-based palliative care intervention in the ICU. The study will include 20 patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary hospital due to sudden severe acute brain injury or progressive organ failure, along with their family caregivers. A palliative care team, comprising a social worker and a palliative care physician, will provide consultations to the ICU healthcare professionals based on the palliative care needs, following family counselling. Additional family meetings will be held if necessary. The primary outcomes will include participation rates, family counselling rates and study completion rates. The intervention's potential impact will be assessed by changes in surrogate decision-making conflict, self-efficacy, depression and anxiety, post-decision regret and the experience of patient-centred and family-centred care. The demand and acceptability of the intervention will be assessed through semi-structured interviews with family surrogates, followed by qualitative analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable national laws and regulations. The clinical study protocol, along with any protocol amendments and the informed consent form, has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital (2404-111-1532). We plan to submit the study results for presentation at conferences and for publication in international peer-reviewed journals. Data will also be made available on request to participants, funding agencies and interested researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06490835.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationClinical Trials as TopicDecision MakingFamilyFeasibility StudiesHumansRepublic of KoreaDecision MakingIntensive Care UnitsPALLIATIVE CARE

Identifiers

PMID40441768
PMCPMC12121608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.