ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2025
Recent advances in applications of machine learning in cervical cancer research: a focus on prediction models.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An integrated microfluidic system for automatic and self-validated analysis of cervical extracellular vesicle markers PD-L1 and ERBB3.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling for cervical cancer: existing AI approaches and the emerging role of vaginal microbiome.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Leveraging machine learning algorithms to assess the impact of cervical cancer early detection on patients' survival.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Innovations in assisted reproductive technology through the advances in artificial intelligence and image processing.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Gynecological Cancers: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are transforming cervical cancer research and offering advancements in diagnosis, prognosis, screening, and treatment. This review explores ML applications with particular emphasis on prediction models. A comprehensive literature search identified studies using ML for survival prediction, risk assessment, and treatment optimization. ML-driven prognostic models integrate clinical, histopathological, and genomic data to improve survival prediction and patient stratification. Screening methods, including deep-learning-based cytology analysis and human papillomavirus detection, enhance accuracy and efficiency. ML-driven imaging techniques facilitate early and precise cancer diagnosis, while risk prediction models assess susceptibility based on demographic and genetic factors. AI also optimizes treatment planning by predicting therapeutic responses and guiding personalized interventions. Despite significant progress, challenges remain regarding data availability, model interpretability, and clinical implementation. Standardized datasets, external validation, and cross-disciplinary collaborations are crucial for implementing ML innovations in clinical settings. Subsequent investigations should prioritize joint initiatives among data scientists, healthcare providers, and health authorities to translate AI innovations into real-world applications and to enhance the impact of ML on cervical cancer care. By synthesizing recent developments, this review highlights the potential of ML to improve clinical outcomes and shaping the future of cervical cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.