ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Education about deprescribing for pre-licensed and licensed healthcare professionals: A scoping review.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Education about deprescribing for pre-licensed and licensed healthcare professionals: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Education about deprescribing for pre-licensed and licensed healthcare professionals: A scoping review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deprescribing is complex because it involves patients' health, values, and preferences. The World Health Organization and Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network have recommended that deprescribing be integrated into health curricula, prompting the need for further understanding about deprescribing education. The purpose of this research is to describe the literature regarding deprescribing education provided to healthcare professionals. We conducted a scoping review using the five-step model by Arksey and O'Malley with revisions from Levac et al. The databases searched included Medline, Scopus, Embase and ERIC. Papers were included if they were written in English and contained an educational intervention about deprescribing tailored toward physicians, pharmacists or nurses. White papers and conference abstracts were included. A total of 4853 abstracts were eligible for screening and 46 papers were included (25 full texts, 15 conference abstracts and 6 white papers). Thirty-three papers utilized group education for their intervention and of these, 20 involved interactive portions. Medicine was the most targeted profession, included in 29 papers. The most common outcomes were the number of medications deprescribed and an increase in learner knowledge and self-efficacy regarding deprescribing using self-assessment surveys or post-educational examinations. We found that there is evidence that educational interventions can increase participant knowledge regarding deprescribing and improve self-efficacy. To expand the education of deprescribing, future interventions should engage and utilize a variety of health professions and interventions could include real patients. Further research is required to determine the retention and application of deprescribing knowledge gained from single educational interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.