Trial reportApplied psychology. Health and well-being2025
Who benefits from mobile health interventions? A dynamical systems analysis of psychological well-being in early adults.
Trial report in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who benefits from mobile health interventions? A dynamical systems analysis of psychological well-being in early adults.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research shows that skills for improving Psychological Well-Being (PWB) may be learned through PWB interventions; however, the dynamic mechanisms underlying this learning process are not well understood. Using an Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) design, we conducted an 8-week Randomized Controlled Trial (N = 160; aged 18-22 years), implemented in a mobile Health (mHealth) platform to characterize these dynamical mechanisms. College-attending early adults were randomized to three groups: an active control group (N = 55); an intervention group (N = 51) with positive practices intervention; and a second intervention group (N = 54) with positive practices and meditation intervention. The mHealth implementation allowed us to introduce the interventions in participants' daily lives while also assessing their PWB (in terms of positive emotions and relationship quality) several times a day. We used a Bayesian process model to analyze changes in PWB in terms of the underlying dynamical characteristics of change. Findings suggested that the mobile assessment tool itself may have longitudinally improved college-attending early adults' PWB, as evidenced by instances of directional changes in dynamic characteristics (increased within-person mean levels, decreased intra-individual variability, and increased regulation) of PWB measures. Moderation analysis also revealed that people who were low on negative affect improved the most in terms of their mean levels of positive emotions and relationship quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.