ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry2026
Comparative Analysis of the Physical Properties of Three Different Tricalcium Silicate Cements: An In Vitro Study.
Article in European journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Calcium trisilicate materials, including biodentine, are popular choices for dental restorations owing to their biocompatibility. However, their compressive strength often falls short of ideal levels for certain restorative procedures. This research investigates the new biodentine formulation in the market, augmented with barium oxide to improve compressive strength and examines its physical characteristics. Materials and Methods: Three distinct material groups were subjected to compressive strength testing. Group A comprised mineral trioxide aggregate (white MTA, Angelus, Londrina, Brazil), group B consisted of biodentine (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France), and group C featured the new commercially available biodentine formulation in the market, Kedo Bio D+ (Kedo Dental, Chennai, India). A universal testing machine was employed to conduct the compressive strength tests under standardized conditions. Results: Across all time intervals, group C consistently displayed the highest average compressive strength, followed by group B, while group A showed the lowest values. The differences in compressive strength between the three groups were statistically significant ( Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the incorporation of barium oxide in Bio D+ formulation significantly enhanced its compressive strength compared with conventional biodentine and MTA. Kedo Bio D+ exhibited superior mechanical properties, making it a promising material for dental restorations requiring increased strength and durability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.