ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Optic flow, a rich source of optic information for harbour seals (Phoca vitulina).
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Underwater visual single target acuity in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine mammal vision is often considered to only provide limited information, particularly underwater in low light levels and turbidity. However, when these animals move through turbid water optic flow is elicited. A past study has documented the harbour seal's (Phoca vitulina) ability to perceive deviations from heading from optic flow simulating movement through a volume of turbid water. Here, we asked whether harbour seals are also able to perceive and analyse surface optic flow. Thus, we simulated three optic flow environments and trained three harbour seals to determine the simulated heading. The harbour seals precisely indicated their heading with a mean (±s.d.) accuracy of 4.61±0.56 deg for volume optic flow, 4.96±0.74 deg for surface optic flow mimicking movement over a surface and 3.58±1.12 deg for surface optic flow mimicking movement underneath a surface. We conclude that harbour seals have access to and can thus rely on optic (flow) information whenever there is enough light for vision, thus refuting existing opinions about poor visual guidance in harbour seals or, more generally, in marine mammals. A detailed analysis of optic flow perception in (semi-) aquatic animals is expected to enhance our understanding of optic flow perception and vision in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.