Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440633›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Protection induced in pigs previously infected by the non-virulent strain 1330 of Streptococcus suis serotype 2 is not due to the secretion of the bacteriocin suicin.

Samantha J Hau, Nahuel Fittipaldi, Servane Payen, Daniel Grenier, Daniel W Nielsen, Susan L Brockmeier, Marcelo Gottschalk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samantha J HauVirus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, ARS, USDA, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0002-8314-7317
Nahuel FittipaldiGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Servane PayenGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Daniel GrenierCentre de Recherche en Infectiologie Porcine et Avicole (CRIPA), Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies (FQRNT), Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Daniel W NielsenRuminant Diseases and Immunology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, ARS, USDA, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Susan L BrockmeierVirus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, ARS, USDA, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Marcelo GottschalkGroupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses en production animale, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptococcus suis is a systemic pathogen of swine and imposes a significant economic burden on the swine industry. Disease with S. suis is controlled with antibiotic treatment and vaccination with inactivated vaccines, which can be derived from the strains circulating on the farm. Inactivated vaccines have shown mixed results with minimal data supporting reductions in morbidity and mortality following their use. With increasing restrictions on antibiotic use and increasing concerns surrounding antimicrobial resistance, alternatives to antibiotics or novel, highly effective vaccines are needed for treating or preventing disease with S. suis. Bacteriocins are a potential alternative to antibiotics, as bacteriocins are antimicrobial peptides produced by bacteria. However, the use of bacteriocins to limit pathogenic S. suis remains relatively under-examined. Live vaccines are a potential novel and effective method of preventing disease, as they provide competition for pathogenic strains and would limit pathogenic strain colonization while stimulating a protective immune response. This study investigated the use of an avirulent, bacteriocin producing isolate of S. suis (90-1330) as an intranasal vaccine and evaluated the role of the bacteriocin by comparing protection to animals inoculated with a mutant lacking bacteriocin production (90-1330Δsuicin). Animals were protected from systemic disease when challenged with a virulent isolate 21 days after inoculation with either 90-1330 or 90-1330Δsuicin but were not protected when challenged 3 days after inoculation. Evaluation of antibody titers showed increased titers 21 days post-inoculation, and the humoral response was likely providing systemic protection. Although 90-1330 was unable to protect animals challenged 3 days post-inoculation, the strain should be considered a good candidate for vaccine development. S. suis 90-1330 was able to induce a protective immune response with a single intranasal inoculation and bacteriocin production may be able to contribute to protection when animals have a lower exposure dose, as in a production setting.

Indexed as

BacteriocinsStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcal VaccinesStreptococcus suisSwine DiseasesAnimalsSerogroupSwineBacteriocinsStreptococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40440633
PMCPMC12122026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.