ArticlePloS one2025
Food label literacy among Malaysian school adolescents: A prevalence study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutrition label literacy and adolescent mental well-being: a three-wave longitudinal study of healthy eating self-efficacy and physical activity as a moderator.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Urban Consumer Behaviors in Kochi, India: Food Choice Motivations, Food Label Literacy, and Nutrition Panel Use.International journal of food science · 2026Article
- Beyond age: understanding how mindful eating and food label reading shape generational differences in health outcomes - a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Making informed food choices is crucial for all ages, especially adolescents who are involved in selecting and buying food. Understanding nutrition labels helps guide choices and ensures nutritional needs are met. This study aims to assess the prevalence and level of food label literacy among school-going adolescents aged 13-16 in Malaysia. This study involved a cross-sectional online survey and was sampled by random sampling involving secondary school adolescents aged 13-16, totaling 1983 subjects across five regions in Malaysia: Central, Southern, Northern, and East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, as well as East Malaysia (Sabah and Sarawak). The questionnaire includes sections on sociodemographic and anthropometric information, as well as three main food label literacy domains: comprehension and interpretation of food labels, skills in using food labels, and attitudes towards food labels. A total of 89.7% of adolescents read food labels with a moderate level of literacy across all three domains (comprehension and interpretation, skills in usage, and attitudes) classified using predefined score ranges based on previous studies. A significant relationship (p < 0.05) was found between age and body mass index-for-age z-score (BAZ) with the level of food label literacy, indicating higher literacy values in older adolescents. Mean scores of all domains A, B, and C across the five regions indicated significant differences at F(4,1978) = 25.8, p = 0.000, F(4,1978) = 17.43, p = 0.000, and F(4,1978) = 25.20, p = 0.000. In conclusion, the proportion of Malaysian adolescents reading food labels is high (89.7%). Nevertheless, the food label literacy level across all three domains is moderate. Hence, the promotion of the importance of nutrition labels in schools through organised programs such as interactive hands-on label reading activities and school-based nutrition campaigns are recommended. A crucial gap in health education can be addressed by fostering proper comprehension, skills, and attitudes toward food labels and facilitating informed dietary practices among adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.