Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440537›Full record

ArticleJournal of strength and conditioning research2025

Is Countermovement Jump Height and One Repetition Maximum Back Squat Associated With the Peak Force of a Front Kick With and Without Carried Load?

Vladan Oláh, Vít Třebický, Jan Maleček, Vladimír Michalička, Jacek Wąsik, Michal Vágner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vladan OláhDepartment of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6873-0008
Vít TřebickýDepartment of Gymnastics and Combat Sports, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1440-1772
Jan MalečekDepartment of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3037-8755
Vladimír MichaličkaDepartment of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-9903
Jacek WąsikInstitute of Physical Culture Science, Jan Dlugosz University of Czestochowa, Poland ; and.ORCID 0000-0002-6285-7283
Michal VágnerDepartment of Military Physical Education, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1343-0187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractOláh, V, Třebický, V, Maleček, J, Michalička, V, Wąsik, J, and Vágner, M. Is countermovement jump height and one repetition maximum back squat associated with the peak force of a front kick with and without carried load? J Strength Cond Res 39(8): 880-889, 2025-The front kick is a fundamental technique used in self-defense and hand to hand combat. This study aimed to test whether front kick performance, both with and without a 30-kg carried load, can be effectively estimated or tracked through commonly available testing procedures such as the countermovement jumps (CMJ) and one repetition maximum back squat (1RM BS). In 2 testing sessions, 21 male participants (mean age = 22.7 years, SD = 1.9) performed 1RM BS, 5 front kicks peak force (FK) without and with 30-kg carried load (FK30), and 3 CMJ without and with 30-kg carried load (CMJ30). A force plate measured the peak force ( N ) of the FK and FK30 and the height (cm) of the CMJ and CMJ30. Statistically significant correlations were found between CMJ and FK ( r = 0.55 [0.225-1], p = 0.005) and CMJ and 1RM BS ( r = 0.54 [0.219-1, p = 0.005]). Carried load reduced both CMJ height by 61% ( d = 3.35 [2.543-∞], p < 0.001) and FK peak force by 23% ( d = 1.33 [0.828-∞], p < 0.001), compared without load condition. A regression model using 1RM BS and CMJ explained 31.5% of FK variance, with only the height of CMJ being statistically significantly associated, β = 0.626, p = 0.015. The study demonstrates that although there is a relationship between explosive power and maximum strengths, FK is more related to CMJ height than 1RM BS. From a practical standpoint, the study suggests that explosive power shows a better association with the FK than the maximal strength. Thus, training programs focused on lower limb explosive power could allow athletes and military personnel to achieve higher FK. Combat sports trainers and hand-to-hand combat instructors may thus consider accordingly updating their training schemes, emphasizing plyometrics and other explosive training methods for enhancing the peak force of kicks.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceMuscle StrengthResistance TrainingAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMovementMuscle, SkeletalWeight-BearingWeight LiftingYoung Adulthand to hand combatmartial artsperformanceself-defensestrengthtraining

Identifiers

PMID40440537
PMCPMC12282594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.