ArticlePLoS medicine2025
Assessment of lung function and severity grading in interstitial lung diseases (% predicted versus z-scores) and association with survival: A retrospective cohort study of 6,808 patients.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory oscillometry identifies disease progression in interstitial lung disease.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Observational
- The need to adopt the z-score in the interpretation of spirometry in Brazil.Respiratory research & clinical practice · 2026Article
- Interstitial lung abnormalities: to treat or not to treat? The hamlet dilemma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- CaNO and eCO Might Be Potential Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Disease Severity and Exacerbations in Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Differences in all-cause mortality by sex in obstructive and restrictive lung diseases.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary function tests (PFTs) are essential for predicting outcomes in interstitial lung disease (ILD). In 2022, an expert panel recommended using z-scores instead of the traditional % predicted cut-off values to interpret the severity of PFT abnormalities which may lead to discordant classifications in some patients. To assess the magnitude and prognostic impact of this phenomenon we compared these two approaches in predicting all-cause mortality in a large cohort of patients with ILDs. METHODS AND
findingsWe retrospectively analyzed data from a tertiary referral center for patients with ILDs. Absolute FEV1, FVC, TLC, and TLCO values from patients' first presentations were transformed and presented as % predicted and z-scores using the most recent global lung initiative (GLI) reference values. Results were categorized for severity according to % predicted and z-score levels. Predictors of all-cause mortality over a 14-year follow-up were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Between January 2009 and March 2023, 6,808 patients with ILDs were evaluated at the National TB and Lung Diseases Research Institute in Warsaw, Poland. Most were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, fibrotic ILD, or non-fibrotic ILD. At their first presentation, 13.2% had airway obstruction, 23.1% had low FVC (indicative of restriction by spirometry), and 45.6% had a reduced lung transfer factor (TLCO). Reclassification of spirometric indices occurred in 26.8% of patients for FEV1 and 24.6% for FVC among those with abnormal results, with most being reassigned to a less severe categories. For TLCO, 28.1% of patients with reduced values were reclassified, with most shifting to more severe categories. During the follow-up, 1,525 (22.4%) of patients died. Both low FVC and low TLCO predicted all-cause mortality, with z-score thresholds showing stronger associations with mortality. A one-unit decrease in the FVC z-score was associated with a 10.3% increase in the risk of death, while a one-unit decrease in TLCO z-score was linked to an over 30% increase in mortality risk. Limitations of this retrospective single-center study include lack of data on cause-specific mortality, potential residual confounding, and limited generalizability to non-Caucasian or younger populations.
conclusionsThe recently recommended use of z-scores leads to significant reclassification of lung function results in patients with ILDs, largely driven by age. This approach is justified by its stronger prognostic associations. Severe TLCO impairment remains a robust predictor of mortality in ILDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.