Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440412›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Improving cancer detection through computer-aided diagnosis: A comprehensive analysis of nonlinear and texture features in breast thermograms.

Hamed Khodadadi, Shima Nazem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamed KhodadadiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Khomeinishahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1562-3564
Shima NazemDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a significant health issue for women, characterized by its high rates of mortality and sickness. However, its early detection is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Thermography, which measures temperature variations between healthy and cancerous tissues, offers a promising approach for early diagnosis. This study proposes a novel method for analyzing breast thermograms. The method segments suspicious masses, extracts relevant features, and classifies them as benign or malignant. While the chaotic indices, including Lyapunov Exponent (LE), Fractal Dimension (FD), Kolmogorov-Sinai Entropy (KSE), and Correlation Dimension (CD), are employed for nonlinear analysis, the Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) method utilized for extracting the texture features. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is enhanced by integrating texture and complexity features. Besides, to optimize feature selection and reduce redundancy, a metaheuristic optimization technique called Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA III) is applied. The proposed method utilizes various machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Pattern recognition Network (Pat net), and Fitting neural Network (Fit net), for classification. ten-fold cross-validation ensures robust performance evaluation. The achieved accuracy of 98.65%, emphasizes the superior performance of the proposed method in thermograms breast cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedThermographyAlgorithmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFractalsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerNonlinear DynamicsSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID40440412
PMCPMC12121922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.