ArticlePloS one2025
Dual-task costs of listening while driving in older and younger adults.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Auditory Training for Everyday Functioning in Later Life.Seminars in hearing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related changes in hearing and cognition result in increased listening difficulties, which could affect the ability to perform common, complex, multitasking behaviours, such as listening while driving. However, there are very few realistic and controlled studies examining how the competing attentional demands of listening while driving affect performance and how performance may differ between younger and older adults. The primary objective of this study was to examine dual-task costs of listening while driving in older (N = 24, Mage = 68.29 years, 15 female) and younger (N = 24, Mage = 26.42 years, 12 female) licensed drivers with normal hearing, vision, and cognition. Participants completed a driving task in a high-fidelity driving simulator during simpler (Rural driving) and more complex (City driving) driving conditions. They also completed the Connected Speech Test (CST) at +4 signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; easier listening) and at 0 SNR (harder listening) conditions. Finally, they completed both tasks simultaneously to examine the dual-task costs of listening while driving. Results demonstrated that only older adults showed significantly poorer listening accuracy on the CST in the dual-task compared to the single-task condition, particularly during the more difficult driving conditions (City driving). Both older and younger adults showed poorer driving performance (greater variability in lane position) in the dual-task compared to the single-task condition, which was most pronounced under the most challenging conditions (City driving, 0 dB SNR listening). However, the magnitude of these dual-task costs during the most challenging conditions was greater in older adults than younger adults. Findings may inform mitigation strategies to reduce the effects of difficult listening conditions on driving performance by optimizing vehicle acoustics or by minimizing auditory distractions, particularly during more challenging driving conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.