ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Planning for successful participant recruitment and retention in trials of behavioural interventions: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Wrapped intervention.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intervention to Increase Condom Use Among Users of Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Self-Sampling Websites (Wrapped): Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) must have sufficient power if planned analyses are to be performed and strong conclusions drawn. A prerequisite of this is successful participant recruitment and retention. Designing a comprehensive plan for participant recruitment and retention prior to trial commencement is recommended, but evidence concerning successful strategies, and how to go about developing a comprehensive plan, is lacking. This paper reports on the application of a six-stage process to develop a recruitment and retention strategy for a future RCT. Stage 1) Rapid evidence review: strategies used in previous trials were identified through database searching. This informed Stage 2) PPI workshop: workshops with public and patient involvement (PPI) group were used to select a sub-set of these strategies based on their potential to be successful and acceptable with the target audience. Stage 3) Focus groups with the target audience: the sub-set was refined through feedback from 15 young people (data subjected to content analysis). Strategies the PPI and focus groups mutually agreed upon proceeded directly to Stage 5; those without consensus proceeded to Stage 4. Stage 4) PPI workshop: PPI members voted on the remaining strategies; those without consensus were discarded. Stage 5) Observation of strategies during feasibility RCT (fRCT): the retained set of strategies were observed in practice in a fRCT in which recruitment and retention data and qualitative feedback from participants was collected. Stage 6) PPI workshop: the fRCT findings were reviewed and strategies for use in the future RCT were finalised. The finalised strategy included set of adverts; schedule of financial incentives; instructions to send survey invite by email, one prompt by SMS prior to data collection, and up to three SMS reminders; procedure to keep participants engaged (e.g., newsletters, personalisation of communications); and procedure if participants fail to complete a research activity (follow-up email/phone call).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.