ArticlePloS one2025
Health inequity: Possibilities of initiating pulmonary telerehabilitation programs for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders in conflict and low-resourced areas; A mixed-method phenomenological study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges and Solutions to Maintaining Health Science Education in Gaza Since October 2023: An Expert Perspective.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe "triple problems of COPD"-underdiagnosis, underrecognition, and underdevelopment of pulmonary rehabilitation programs-are global. Pulmonary telerehabilitation (PTR) may solve these problems. This study aims to explore the possibility of launching PTR programs for adults in an area of conflict and low resources.
methodsA mixed methods convergent design was used to understand outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) unavailability. The medical records of 70 patients with COPD in the Ministry of Health (MoH) chest unit were analysed quantitatively. thirteen patients who received in-hospital physiotherapy were questioned via a structured and validated questionnaire, and 12 healthcare professionals (HCPs) were interviewed. Quantitative data was analyzed descriptively, and inferentially by the SPSS, outlining the means, standard deviations and percentages, and the chi-square, respectively. Qualitative data was analyzed thematically using the NVivo software, and five themes and 25 subthemes were identified. A thematic framework and triangulation model were depicted accordingly.
resultsSeventy patients with a mean age of 65.3 ± 1.65 years and a mean hospital stay of 4.89 ± 0.392 days were managed with no admission, Physiotherapy (PT) referral, or discharge criteria. Patients reported needing outpatient PR (4.38 ± 1.193) and a willingness to adopt (3.77 ± .832). Interviews with HCP highlighted the environmental and professional challenges, opportunities, and PTR traits. Quantitative and qualitative data triangulation led to the COPD Sequential Triad (CST) theory.
conclusionThis study identified the national, institutional, and professional challenges and opportunities of launching PTR programs in conflict and low-resourced areas, including the conflict's consequences, insufficient resources, and absence of a structured healthcare system and clinical practice guidelines. Promoting health equity in such areas necessitates that the international community and institutions isolate the healthcare sector from conflicts and apply more effective strategies. The study also illustrated the characteristics of the intended PTR programs, including mHealth, therapeutic devices, and hybrid programs along with supporting professional organizations' guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.