ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Exploring gender stereotypes and norms among peri-urban very young adolescents in Zimbabwe using participatory and qualitative approaches.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clustering socio-demographic of Indonesian adolescents and their associations with depression: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Hidden distress: a qualitative study of sociocultural barriers to mental health help-seeking among young people in Zimbabwe.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- How do social norms influence the sexual and reproductive health-related attitudes and behaviours of very young adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gender stereotypes and norms shape very young adolescents' (VYAs, 10-14 years old) behaviours, including in relation to sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This formative study sought to determine and prioritise the stereotypes and norms to be targeted as part of work to co-develop a gender-transformative intervention for VYAs in Zimbabwe to promote positive masculinities and SRH. In 2023, we collected data from VYAs, using participatory workshops encompassing various activities. We also held focus group discussions with older adolescents and parents/guardians, and individual interviews with community influencers. We used interpretive thematic analysis to generate themes across data. We later presented research findings to diverse stakeholders to explore how the findings might influence the design of our gender-transformative intervention. Gender stereotypes emerged in relation to sexual behaviour and SRH norms. Both boys and girls seemed to condone boys' multiple, concurrent relationships. Boys were deemed to be unable to control their sexual urges. Menstrual stigma, myths and misconceptions were pervasive. Stereotypes were also evident in beliefs and norms around resource and task allocation. For example, both boys and girls concurred that given limited resources, educating a boy child should be prioritised even when a girl sibling is performing better academically. Stereotypes relating to labour distribution were also evident. Daily activity charts suggested longer working hours for girls. Differential attitudes towards drug and substance use among boys and girls were driven by underlying masculine norms. Of note, adolescents disapproved of some of these norms, pointing to an opportunity to shift them. Stakeholders highlighted the need for our planned intervention to focus on the wider community, in addition to VYAs themselves. The formative research enabled us to identify key gender stereotypes and norms, information which is critical for informing the planned gender-transformative intervention. Although deeply seated, these stereotypes are not insurmountable, particularly among VYAs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.