ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of physical characteristics among english professional and semi-professional soccer players across different leagues.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multivariate Neuromuscular Profile and Principal Component Analysis: A Pilot Study in Professional Female Soccer Players.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate if differences exist in neuromuscular qualities between different leagues in English male soccer. Twenty soccer players (age: 23.3 ± 5.2 years, stature: 180.3 ± 7.0 cm, mass: 82.5 ± 7.7 kg) from English football league two (EFL2). 34 soccer players (age: 25.8 ± 4.3 years, stature: 180.9 ± 5.6 cm, mass: 81.4 ± 8.6 kg) from National league (NL) and 23 soccer players (age: 27.5 ± 4.3 years, stature: 182.1 ± 5.5 cm, mass: 84.1 ± 8.0 kg) from National league North (NLN). Each player completed three to five repetitions of the countermovement jump (CMJ), countermovement rebound jump (CMJRJ) and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP). Trivial to small differences were observed in CMJ jump height, CMJ momentum, relative average braking and propulsion force, time to take-off and modified reactive strength index (RSI) (p > 0.265, d = 0.05-0.55). However, moderate to large (p ≤ 0.009, d = 0.94-1.25) differences were observed in countermovement depth. Trivial to moderate differences were observed in absolute and relative peak net force and force at 100 and 250 ms (p ≥ 0.092, d = 0.13-0.63). Trivial to moderate differences were observed in CMJRJ rebound jump height and rebound jump momentum (p ≥ 0.440, d = 0.17-0.41). NLN players had longer rebound contact time and lower rebound RSI, rebound average relative braking and propulsion forces to a large magnitude (p ≤ 0.001, d = 1.18-1.85), with small differences between ELF2 and NL (p > 0.536, d = 0.11-0.39). Lower reactive qualities of NLN players could explain observed leagues, considering their relationship with match scoring situations. All players would be considered weak (<30 N/kg) and practitioners should prioritise lower limb strength across all leagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.