Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440240›Full record

ArticleAnimal biotechnology2025

Quality and microbial community analysis of solid-state fermented feed with mixed bacteria from corn silage.

Lanlan Zhang, Shiyu Yang, Zhihong Yan, Tianling Fu, Can Xiulan, Ping Li, Ceng Gong, Lili Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lanlan ZhangCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Shiyu YangCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Zhihong YanCollege of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Tianling FuCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Can XiulanGuizhou Yuhong Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Guiyang, P. R. China.
Ping LiGuizhou Livestock Germplasm Testing Center, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Ceng GongCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, P. R. China.
Lili CaoCollege of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of microbial fermented feeds (FF) is highly dependent on microbial composition, underscoring the need for locally sourced, cost-effective formulations to advance sustainable livestock production. In this study, bacteria from corn silage (CSB) were screened for the preparation of solid-state fermented feed (SFF). In addition, for the purpose of comparison, purchased marketed fermentation bacteria (PMB) for SFF were also tested using the same methodology. Anaerobic fermentation was carried out by adding 5% CSB, PMB, and saline to conventional feeds at 37 °C, respectively. Then 10 g of fermentation samples was collected on days 0, 3, and 5, respectively. The composition and diversity of the microbial community were subsequently analyzed using high-throughput sequencing. The pH, titratable acidity (TA), and nutrient index of the feeds before and after fermentation were determined. High-throughput sequencing results showed that the dominant genera of CSB were

Indexed as

Animal FeedBacteriaMicrobiotaSilageZea maysAnimalsFermentationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingCorn silage microorganismsfeed amino acidsmicrobial communitysolid-state fermented feedWeissella

Identifiers

PMID40440240
PMCPMC12674391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.