ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Smoking Prevalence, Susceptibility to Cigarette Smoking, and Its Causes in 568 Adolescent Male High School Students in Southern Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Smoking prevalence and emerging tobacco product use among Saudi adolescents: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Early Initiation and Dual Patterns of Cigarette and E-Cigarette Use among Adults in the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Barriers to glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists used for obesity management among the general population in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia, and their relation to smoking cessation and antidepressants.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking is the single largest and most critical public health issue in the world, if smoking is initiated early in life, it can have long-term consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of cigarette smoking in 568 adolescent male high school students in southern Saudi Arabia and their susceptibility to smoking using the Expanded Susceptibility to Smoking Index (ESSI), the short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale (UPPS-P), and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). MATERIAL AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted among 568 male students aged 15-18 years in randomly selected high schools. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that included the ESSI, the UPPS-P, and the PANAS. Descriptive statistics and inferential analysis using chi-square tests and logistic regression were performed using SPSS. RESULTS The prevalence of current cigarette smoking was 19.4%. Among non-smokers, 41.9% were not susceptible, 34.9% were susceptible, and 23.2% were highly susceptible, but the differences were not statistically significant. A higher susceptibility to smoking was significantly associated with higher impulsivity (P<0.001) and greater negative affect (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis identified key predictors, including peer influence, sensation seeking, and emotional affect. CONCLUSIONS The findings reveal a notable prevalence of cigarette smoking and high susceptibility among non-smoking adolescent males. Psychological traits such as impulsivity and emotional affect were significantly linked to smoking risk. These results highlight the need for targeted school-based prevention programs addressing both behavioral and emotional factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.