Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440215›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2025

The Role of Faculty in Cultivating Thriving Campus STEM Ecosystems.

Tess L Killpack, Carolyn L Sandoval, Bryan M Dewsbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tess L KillpackDepartment of Biology, Salem State University, Salem, MA 01970.
Carolyn L SandovalUniversity of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Bryan M DewsburyDepartment of Biology, STEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

College and university campuses are complex ecosystems, and accounting for this complexity is crucial to understanding how to create conditions of equity and inclusion. Our academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) ecosystems are rooted in exclusionary norms and a false notion of being apolitical and fully objective, which has present-day negative consequences for our students. In this essay, we use a bioecological lens to better understand some of the factors that unfairly and disproportionately impact marginalized students in our STEM ecosystems. We focus our discussion on one component of the ecosystem, STEM faculty, and how they can serve as foundation species to direct our STEM ecosystems toward equity and empathy. We share how faculty can interrogate and take ownership for the ways that we perpetuate the exclusionary norms of STEM in our practice. We then propose specific strategies for faculty to nurture comprehensive niche-building to support students inside and outside of our classrooms. Although faculty instructional roles are the focus of this essay, we close with an acknowledgment of some additional opportunities for faculty to leverage their influence through research and institutional leadership to promote equity and inclusion in biology education and STEM ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemEngineeringFacultyMathematicsScienceTechnologyHumansStudentsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID40440215
PMCPMC12286628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.