Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40440187›Full record

ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Oral Anticoagulants in Women: What's the Difference? A Narrative Review.

Elena Maria Faioni, Barbara Scimeca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena Maria FaioniAnticoagulant Clinic, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8731-6531
Barbara ScimecaAnticoagulant Clinic, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender sensitive medicine refers to the need to individualize epidemiology, diagnosis, knowledge of disease presentation, and therapy based also on sex and gender. An impressive amount of scientific literature deals now with sex and gender differences in disease. Not so much, yet, on individualized therapeutic approaches. Part of the reason lies in how studies that deal with the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of drugs are conducted. Often women are under-represented, and/or no gender specific analysis of outcomes is performed. As a consequence, in many fields of medicine, not as much is known about important and life-saving drug dosage, safety and efficacy in women as in men. Oral anticoagulants are not the exception, even if new regulations are operative regarding inclusion of women in all phases of drug studies. The result is that there are many areas of uncertainty or outright confusion regarding the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in women that need to be addressed.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAdministration, OralFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsAnticoagulantsanticoagulantsatrial fibrillationbleedingcoumarinsdirect oral anticoagulantsvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID40440187
PMCPMC12123104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.