ReviewThe Biochemical journal2025
Molecular basis and therapeutic implications of binary YAPOn/YAPOff cancer classes.
Review in The Biochemical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- YAP and TEAD Are Transcriptional Regulators of Neuroendocrine Differentiation and Growth in Carcinoid Cells.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancers have traditionally been classified based on their tissue of origin. However, with advances in sophisticated genome sequencing techniques and progression toward an era of precision medicine, it has become increasingly clear that classifying tumors based on unifying molecular features instead of tissue of origin may hold the key to improving patient outcomes. Various efforts have been undertaken to address this critical aspect of cancer biology, but it is still unclear as to the best approach to stratify tumors into different molecular classes. One approach is to define many small subclasses based on complex molecular signatures, while another option is to divide cancers into larger groups based on higher-order features of cancer behavior. This latter approach holds appeal as it may provide opportunities to identify broadly relevant therapeutics. However, our understanding of these fundamental 'rules' of cancer biology and how they can be used to better classify and treat cancers is in its infancy. We recently demonstrated that cancers can be functionally stratified into binary YAPon and YAPoff super-classes with unique therapeutic vulnerabilities based on distinct expression and function of the transcriptional coactivators, YAP and TAZ. In YAPon cancers, YAP and TAZ drive oncogenesis, whereas in YAPoff cancers, YAP and TAZ are instead tumor suppressors. In this review, we discuss our understanding of these distinct cancer classes with a focus on the mechanisms that underlie the opposite function of YAP/TAZ in YAPon and YAPoff cancers, as well as the potential therapeutic implications of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.