Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439988›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025

Toward accurate vaginal microbiome profiling: protocol, bioinformatics, and core microbiota characterisation.

Isabella M Davidson, Elham Nikbakht, Larisa M Haupt, Paul J Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabella M DavidsonFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina QLD 4226, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4672-7922
Elham NikbakhtFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina QLD 4226, Gold Coast, Australia.
Larisa M HauptStem Cell and Neurogenesis Group, Genomics Research Centre, Centre for Genomics and Personalised Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 60 Musk Ave., Kelvin Grove, QLD, Brisbane, 4059, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-8110
Paul J DunnFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina QLD 4226, Gold Coast, Australia. pdunn@bond.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-7430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRising demand for assisted reproductive technologies (ART) with limited improvements in success rates has driven interest in the impact of the vaginal microbiome on fertility outcomes. In order to fully examine the relationship between the vaginal microbiome and fertility outcomes, methodologies and technological developments must be standardised and benchmarked to provide the most accurate assessment of microbial population representation.

methodsThis study sought to investigate the utility of 16S sequencing and bioinformatic approaches using nanopore sequencing to characterize core vaginal microbiota in a healthy Australian cohort of reproductive-age women.

resultsOptimisation and comparison of different PCR strategies for whole 16S amplification was undertaken, along with the generation of bioinformatic analysis strategies. Initial qPCR identified the 27F-YM (MIX) primer as the most sensitive for C. trachomatis. However, nanopore sequencing revealed no detectable C. trachomatis across all six samples. Among the bioinformatic tools, Porechop with NanoCLUST most accurately identified microbial presence. Community state type (CST) I-characterised by Lactobacillus crispatus dominance-was identified as the most common CST (66%), aligning with patterns of a healthy vaginal microbiome.

conclusionThe findings highlight a Lactobacillus-rich microbiome as the most common among healthy females; however, further refinement-potentially through a metagenomics approach-is recommended to address 16S rRNA primer limitations to enable improved accuracy of microbial detection for the vaginal microbiome.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaVaginaAdultAustraliaChlamydia trachomatisComputational BiologyFemaleHumansReproductive Techniques, AssistedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA sequencingBioinformaticsCommunity state types (CSTs)LactobacillusNanopore sequencingVaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID40439988
PMCPMC12356782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.