Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439985›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2025

Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.

Allison West, Diana Eldreth Chute, Jane Daniels, Kelly M Bower

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison WestDepartment of Population Family, & Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. awest25@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8182-9328
Diana Eldreth ChuteDepartment of Population Family, & Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Jane DanielsDepartment of Population Family, & Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Kelly M BowerJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-engaged research (CEnR) has potential to advance early home visiting and improve health outcomes for all families by ensuring that research aligns with the needs of the community, methods and procedures are acceptable and accessible, and findings are interpreted accurately and disseminated effectively. We conducted a scoping review to characterize the extent and nature of CEnR in peer-reviewed literature relevant to early home visiting. We searched five scholarly databases for literature published since 2010 describing engagement of community members in research involving evidence-based early home visiting programs. We extracted data on each study's characteristics, community collaborators, and factors, outcomes, and measures of community engagement. We then coded each study for 16 community engagement components and characterized each study along an established continuum of CEnR. Fourteen articles met all eligibility criteria and were characterized as involving community consultation, community participation, or community-based participatory research. No articles were characterized as community initiated or driven. No studies assessed the impact of community engagement, and only two described barriers or facilitators to engagement. CEnR may be underutilized and underreported in peer-reviewed home visiting research. Findings highlight opportunities to build motivation and capacity for CEnR, transparency in CEnR reporting, and evaluation of CEnR process and impacts.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHouse CallsPeer Review, ResearchHumansPeer ReviewCommunity-engaged researchHealth equityHome visitationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID40439985
PMCPMC12245935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.