Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439979›Full record

SynthesisAmbio2025

Perceptions of coastal vegetated ecosystems: A systematic review across geographical and sectoral dimensions.

Jay Mar D Quevedo, Michelle Ann Miller, Dixon T Gevaña, Danny Marks, Daniel A Friess, Prayoto Tonoto, David Taylor

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ambio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay Mar D QuevedoAsia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, AS8, #07-45, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore. jquevedo@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-4462
Michelle Ann MillerAsia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, AS8, #07-45, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore, 119260, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-8398
Dixon T GevañaCollege of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines, Tamesis Bldg. Martin Reyes St., 4031, Los Baños, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-3032
Danny MarksSchool of Law and Government, Dublin City University, DCU Glasnevin Campus, Dublin 9, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0833-880X
Daniel A FriessDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, 70118, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3087-5233
Prayoto TonotoRiau Provincial Environment and Forestry Office, Jl. Jenderal Sudirman No. 468, Pekanbaru City, Riau, 28126, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-3218
David TaylorDepartment of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, AS2-03-01, 1 Arts Link, Singapore, 117568, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6098-5636

Funding

Singapore Social Science Research Council, Ministry of Education MOE2021-SSRTG-021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coastal vegetated ecosystems such as mangrove forests, seagrass meadows, and tidal marshes provide a wide array of ecosystem services. They also play a vital role in climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration. However, they are among the most threatened ecosystems globally. This study addresses a key knowledge gap by conducting a systematic review of academic literature on sectoral perceptions of these ecosystems. Through content analysis, we identified common research themes across regions and examined how members of the public, private, and civil society sectors perceive coastal vegetated ecosystems. The results reveal regional differences: Asian countries tend to emphasize utilization and economic benefits, while North America and Europe focus more on conservation and management. Several studies explored perceptions of climate change mitigation. Our findings highlight gaps in perception between the private and government agencies. Understanding these diverse sectoral perspectives can inform policy interventions to enhance conservation efforts and strengthen governance strategies.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemClimate ChangeWetlandsBlue carbonContent analysisGovernanceManagementSector-level perceptions

Identifiers

PMID40439979
PMCPMC12405094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.