ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2025
Reduction and outcome of posterior pilon fractures with intercalary fragments: a retrospective cohort study comparing the transfibular and posteromedial approaches.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe transfibular fracture region (TFFR) approach can be utilized for managing posterior pilon fractures associated with intercalary fragments. However, its long-term outcomes remain unreported. This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of the TFFR approach and the posteromedial approach for posterior pilon fractures (Klammer type 2/3, Danis-Weber type B) associated with displaced intercalary fragments over an average 8 year follow-up.
methodFrom 2012 to 2018, a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation surgery via either the TFFR approach or the posteromedial approach for posterior pilon fracture associated with intercalary fragments were enrolled for this study. Clinical outcomes were evaluated over an average 8 year (range 5-12 years) follow-up. The surgical duration, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, and postoperative complications were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) score at last follow-up.
resultsSeventy-nine patients were included in the final analysis, including 43 in the TFFR group and 36 in the posteromedial group. No significant differences between the two groups were observed in the FAOS (p = 0.679) or its specific components for symptoms (p = 0.264), pain (p = 0.963), activities of daily living (ADL, p = 0.102), sports (p = 0.156), or quality of life (p = 0.859). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in the FAAM-ADL (p = 0.408), FAAM-Sport (p = 0.617), and SF-36 scores (p = 0.757). Nevertheless, the surgical duration was shorter in the TFFR group (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe TFFR approach is not inferior to the posteromedial approach. For posterior pilon fractures with lateral malleolar fractures in the same plane, the TFFR approach may be preferred owing to its potential to reduce surgical time and the use of a single incision. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.