Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439936›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as postmortem diagnostic tool.

Jan Michael Federspiel, Mattias Kettner, Stefan Potente, Sara Heinbuch, Constantin Lux, Marcel A Verhoff, Frank Ramsthaler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan Michael FederspielInstitute for Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Campus Homburg, Building 49.1, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany. jmfederspiel@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9325-2658
Mattias KettnerInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596, Frankfurt (Main), Hessen, Germany.
Stefan PotenteInstitute for Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Campus Homburg, Building 49.1, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Sara HeinbuchInstitute for Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Campus Homburg, Building 49.1, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Constantin LuxInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596, Frankfurt (Main), Hessen, Germany.
Marcel A VerhoffInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Goethe University, Kennedyallee 104, 60596, Frankfurt (Main), Hessen, Germany.
Frank RamsthalerInstitute for Legal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University, Campus Homburg, Building 49.1, Kirrberger Straße 100, 66421, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie 04/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cardiac death, some entities, such as arrhythmia or nonocclusive myocardial ischemia, are not associated with clear and certain macroscopic surrogates of cardiac death. Cardiac biomarker point-of-care testing (POCT) seems suitable for further improving postmortem diagnostics in legal medicine casework. Considering the preanalytic phase, the present study aims to define criteria for blood samples suitable for POCT and assess the diagnostic performance of postmortem cardiac biomarker POCT. A fluorescent immunoassay device was used. The biomarkers assessed were myoglobin, brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal proBNP, creatine kinase muscle-brain type, and cardiac troponin I. Blood was obtained from the intrapericardial inferior vena cava. In a prestudy, criteria for the selection of blood samples were established and the biomarker stability over time, test reliability and reproducibility of postmortem cardiac biomarker analyses were assessed. Afterward, blood samples from 150 autopsied individuals were evaluated for their diagnostic performance and compared with findings from autopsy as the postmortem diagnostic gold standard. In doing so, the assessed biomarkers provided valid and reproducible results. Cardiac troponin I yielded the highest sensitivity for detecting cardiac death, whereas BNP had the highest specificity and positive predictive value for detecting cardiac death. Markers of myocardial damage had better negative than positive predictive value. NT-proBNP and BNP POCT seem applicable to support diagnosis of death associated with congestive heart failure. Postmortem cardiac biomarker POCT results need to be interpreted in conjunction with all available information, i.e., autopsy findings, medical history, investigatory results, and other test results.

Indexed as

BiomarkersPoint-of-Care TestingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyCreatine Kinase, MB FormFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumMyoglobinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkersCreatine Kinase, MB FormMyoglobinNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)Troponin ICardiac biomarkersCardiac deathDiagnostic performanceHeart failurePoint-of-care testingPostmortem blood analysis

Identifiers

PMID40439936
PMCPMC12354503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.